Rolex Submariner 116610 vs. Sea-Dweller 126600
Thinking of getting a Rolex plunge observe yet haven’t chosen which model to get yet? Perhaps this comparison between the Rolex Submariner 116610 and the Sea-Dweller 126600 will help you choose. Peruse on to find the similitudes and contrasts between these two artistic clad tempered steel Rolex divers.
Design: Submariner 116610 versus Ocean Dweller 126600
At first look, the Submariner 116610 LN and the Sea-Dweller 126600 are very comparative in looks. All things considered, the two of them have 904L tempered steel Oyster cases, dark Cerachrom artistic bezels, dark dials with a date window, and treated steel Oyster arm bands. Be that as it may, in the event that we investigate these components, the distinctions start to uncover themselves.
Firstly, the Submariner 116610 and the Sea-Dweller 126600 may have comparative appearances; nonetheless, their cases are really various sizes. The Submariner’s case has a 40mm width, while the Sea-Dweller’s case estimates 43mm. Albeit past adaptations of the Sea-Dweller had 40mm cases, the extra 3mm makes for a perceptibly bigger presence on the wrist and obliges the Sea-Dweller’s helium get away from valve, which permits it to be utilized for immersion plunging. We should not fail to remember that the Sea-Dweller is water-impervious to 1,220 meters (4,000 feet!), which is multiple times the Sub’s 300-meter profundity rating.
If we direct our concentration toward the unidirectional bezels on the two watches, we’ll see that the Submariner’s Cerachrom bezel embed incorporates markings for every one of the initial 15 minutes followed by markings for like clockwork. Then again, the Sea-Dwellers’ Cerachrom bezel embed has graduations right around the bezel for the complete an hour. The two bezels incorporate an iridescent pearl at 12 o’clock.
Moving to the essence of the watches, we see that they have practically indistinguishable designs with lume-filled hour producers outlined by white gold, brilliant Mercedes-style hands, and a date window at the 3 o’clock area. Moreover, with the presentation of the ref. 126600, Rolex added a Cyclops amplification focal point to the precious stone of the Sea-Dweller, bringing these two watches considerably nearer together. Both of these Rolex jumpers have Chromalight as their radiant material, which gleams blue in obscurity. Obviously, the content on the dials contrasts to mirror each watch’s model name and profundity rating, with the Sea-Dweller accepting red content for its name – a respect to the first form of the Sea-Dweller from the 1960s.
The greatest contrast between the tightened Oyster wristbands of the Submariner 116610 and the Sea-Dweller 126600 is the catch. The two arm bands come furnished with a collapsing Oysterlock security catch and the Glidelock augmentation framework. Nonetheless, the Sea-Dweller is further outfitted with the Fliplock expansion connect so the arm band can reach out by an extra 26mm to fit over a thicker wetsuit.
Movement, Production, and Price: Submariner 116610 versus Ocean Dweller 126600
The Submariner 116610 sudden spikes in demand for Rolex’s Caliber 3135 development, which has a force hold of around 42 hours. Then again, the Sea-Dweller 126600 is fueled by the Caliber 3235, which offers clients a 70-hour power reserve. Interestingly, on the off chance that you flip the watches around to take a gander at the fluted casebacks that secure the developments, you’ll notice that the Sea-Dweller includes an engraving (ROLEX OYSTER SEA-DWELLER. Unique GAS ESCAPE VALVE) on the steel surface – not a common sight on Rolex watches. On the other hand, the Submariner, as most Rolex watches) has a plain caseback.
The Submariner 116610LN made its introduction at Baselworld 2010 and keeps on being a piece of Rolex’s present inventory today. Rolex dispatched the Sea-Dweller ref. 126600 of every 2017 as an update to the 40mm form of the Sea-Dweller, and since it has just been underway two or three years, there are altogether less instances of the Sea-Dweller 126600 accessible the auxiliary market than the Submariner 116610LN.
The Sea-Dweller ref. 126600 retails for $11,350. Anyway nowadays, they regularly sell for more than their retail cost on the auxiliary market because of protracted shortlists for the watch at approved retailers. Also, albeit the ref. 126600 is Sea-Dweller is as yet underway, it has just been accessible two or three years, so there are a moderately modest number in existence.
Although the authority retail cost of the Submariner 116610LN is $8,550, its an obvious fact that it is trying to try and discover one available to be purchased at a Rolex shop nowadays, on account of their unfathomably popularity. Subsequently, hope to pay nearer to $10,000 for a used Submariner ref. 116610LN and two or three thousand more for an unworn model on the optional market.
To summarize, the new Sea-Dweller 126600 is more water-safe, more uncommon, larger, and more costly than the momentum Submariner 116610LN. By the by, nobody can reject that the Submariner is by a long shot the more mainstream jump watch between the two. Indeed, the Submariner is no ifs, ands or buts the most celebrated jumper in the watch world, period. In this manner, the Submariner 116610LN offers more extensive allure while the Sea-Dweller 126600 is darling by a more modest niche.
Among these two, which Rolex jumper is your favorite?